The latest politician to enter the race for the White House is Rand Paul, the son of a pretty famous former Congressman, Ron Paul.
We're about unity but it is very clear that Rand Paul is a lightning rod splitting the Liberty movement into two very distinct camps - The Ron Paul Classical Libertarians and the Rand Paul Neo-Republitarians.
No place searched has explained this so-called black-ideology so eloquently, and over the eons emphatically taught, as in Machiavelli's “The Prince.”
It is required reading in every Ivy League school, and for a reason. It was even laid bear in my Catholic University, Loyola New Orleans, presented in Professor Tungate's “Process and effects of Mass Communications” class.
A noteworthy and memorable assemblage of which, at that time, considered the most informative subject forum in the department, and of course, for those less motivated, the hardest. It explained to a tyrannical King, sure-fire and time-tested methods to promote and maintain power over the populous, by unscrupulous tyranny, and hidden under the protective edge of illusion.
How to play one side against the other was of primary focus, and rendered by all forms of media without the restrictions of a normal human conscious, or moral compass. Propaganda of the highest order, scientifically sound, it was created for the primary reason and motivation for a King to flourish, to rule, to endure.
And we are, in the Liberty movement, opposed to such tactics, this motility of totalitarian dominance. Of course I do not speak for all Libertarians, but Liberty from tyranny is the main tenant of the movement.
We want our Republic based on Constitutional law restored, and some are prepared not only to work for that end, but to risk everything, even our lives, to make it so. It is a powerful affirmation, a Libertarian point of view... You see, if one can find little or nothing to die for, one can find little or nothing to live for, and that in essence is the force behind the most powerful Liberty shibboleth: “Give me Liberty, or give me death.”
This precept transcends all we may hold dear in this life, as we weigh our Liberty to have a God-inspired substance. Liberty is not grated by tyrants, not in this world, but won. And every generation must win it for themselves... If they do not, if they become passive, inactive, or lethargically non-responsive, they will quickly lose it. And once gone, only blood will get it back. A tyrant will do anything to stay in power, and this is beyond the ken of moral and ethical people.
No chronicled depiction in human history has more validity and proof... No shout ever recorded from the lips of our founding countrymen has more value to a patriot then this singularity: Liberty is bought by the blood of Tyrants and Patriots...
When the curtain falls, as do all empires built by the lust of ignoble men, one side will hunt down the opposition to the last man, be they patriots or tyrants. There is no guarantee. And yet we believe, as a people, that there is a law, a universal law... and it is as gleaming to an artist who finds the golden ratio in everything he so loves.
The law of cause and effect guides our minds of reason, of reality, of intellect... and it states that we will all, to the very last man, get our just reward. This goes for all of the worlds created by men, his inspired religions based on fear, his corporations based on greed, his country based on tyranny, and all of it encompassed in a universal law of what you sow, so too will you reap.
There seems to be hope in that, hope that it will all turn around by the hand of God, but it is not found in the reality of nature. If you want to survive in this world, you must stand up to the opposition, and if you do not, you will be eaten alive.
That sir, is the true law of nature. And know this, there is a repercussion to our actions called “blow-back” and it is a powerful concept for those who want to learn by previous mistakes. Each of us are responsible, not only by what we do, but by what we allow others to do in our name.
Look for part two soon, with a descriptive schematic of our world.
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty of safety.” ~ Benjamin Franklin
______________________________________________
Every institution, be it a religion, corporation, or government, wants to spread its influence outward, and if its power is strong enough, to ultimately dominate the entire world. If opportunity presents itself, it is human nature to push forward. Seems a simple concept, but one not easily understood, because good people of moral conscience tends to have faith in their fellow man, and think that others have the same mindset, and want what is good for all. This is not true, and though the ideal that coexistence might be created for mutual benefit, in the real world one facet will always seek advancement over the other. Never in the history of mankind has one group coexisted with another for very long, putting the general welfare of another group over their own. Sure, men with mutual interests do unite to fight a common foe, in time of war more often, and too, to create a competitive edge, but if that danger is eradicated, the partnership will soon dissolve, as each will try to absorb the other... On face value, the whole idea of an idealistic coexistence is a farce, as both sides will soon vie for power and control over the other. With Christian Love in your hearts, you oppose others who use your sensitivity to control you. You choose friends who are motivated by vengeance and wrath, and it is a snake that will ultimately turn on you. Look at your own media, and determine if Christian ethics are promoted there, and who controls it? Tyranny laughs at those crying for Liberty.
I have decided to take on the idea of vaccinations. As always, to get to the truth, one must hit that ball back and forth, and when the dust settles, hopefully the truth will be visible... hopefully, we will recognize it when we see it!
One might think the argument a simple matter to consider, and yet there is a powerful triangulation that stymies most all civility, and the truth of this matter is covered in both fear and outright lies. If you want to know the truth, which is not always evident in the world of men, follow the paper trail.
If there is a corporate profit to be made, more than likely there will be little or no moral compass, as the corporation is compartmentalized just for that purpose... Individuals, except for those calling the shots from the top, do not feel or understand the workings of other departments, and so do not feel responsible for the whole, or its overt consequences. And so, if love and fear is the primary motivator of an individual, there will, there must be a moral equivalent.
And that is what I'm looking to find here...Of course, there are exceptions, but I challenge you to find one. Even an individual who might take a stand on a social issue on a television program, or a restaurant perhaps, or other businesses who might make it known that it is opposed to some government mandate, must have indeed calculated that there was a good chance they would survive the ordeal, and even formulate the possibility that it might be lucrative, before coming forth and taking a stand.
Yes, so terrible to consider, that goodness may be tainted, but how rare are the kinds that have come forth knowing full well that their take on a particular subject would ultimately destroy their very livelihood? Can you name one? Whistle-blowers come to mind...
On one side is a woman who thinks that her children will be at risk unless it in mandated by government that all children be required, by pain of fine and or imprisonment, to be vaccinated... If they refuse, they must have virtual forfeiture of any further participation inside of that society, branded publicly, marked so that they will be identified everywhere they travel, and will be forever labeled as such, unless of course, they resend...it is the price paid for dissonance on one hand, and an unquestioned and dominating authority on the other.
Civil Disobedience, the Constitution, our civil liberties, freedom, Liberty from tyranny, all morality and ethics, Love and joy, all civility, all politeness, all of science, all of history and our future, everything both artful or speculated by scientific hypothesis, and our undeniable imagination... all of it would be pulverized by a woman guarding her children... and it is well known that she would do anything, anything at all...
And Big Pharmacy knows this... and the paper trail both begins and ends there...
Big Pharmacy is even bigger then the Military Industrial Complex, and Government wants to control that... oh, really? And what is big government?
It is a collection of corporations with a singular mindset, working in conjunction... and by the use of media, and corporate lawyers, they pay billions for their drug adds, at the same time lobbing congress to support them in their monetary-big-Pharmacy endeavors.
Lobbying is not a plead for help; it is bought and paid for...It may or may not surprise you to know that “Obama-care,..” you know the one that had to pass so that we could see what was inside? Well, now the thousands of pages are found to be full of doublespeak, and convoluted lawyer loop-holes, and has a Big Brother Pharmacy-fingerprint on every page.
They finally had enough from both sides to vote it in, and what prey-tell changed their minds, not actually knowing what was in it? What could change the mind of a man who is bought and paid for?
So lets hit the ball back for a moment
Why would a loving woman take a stand against another loving woman, unless her mind is filled with something else, like fear. And where would she get this fear? From a long-ago teacher? An inner voice of reason? What if, let us consider for a moment... media propaganda? And who controls this media, corporations do, and what is their primary objective?
Is it a cure for cancer? Is it a free drug that cures diabetes? No, no more so then a good surgeon want to tell you that a topical cream will get rid of a planter's wart. Cutting it out will be far more effective, we are told, and they sleep very well at night, justifying that it is...
Wait, lets bounce it back again
Isn't Anti-vaccination parents deemed by Pro-vaccinated parents to be dangerous and irresponsible? And that without that particular vaccination, as all others are required by law to do, the individual, along with their entire family, will be scorned as irresponsive to the collective needs of our civilization, and the decision to withdraw from the system irresponsible.
Some, but not all, who are Pro-Vaccination, say the chance is worth the risk, even in the wake of admitting that the increase in autism is not readily understood. 10,000 to one a decade ago is now 50 to one... and looks to be still escalating... Yes, escalating, with an unknown trigger.
Is it as simple as one person not being able to put their feet in another person's shoes? Surely, you would think differently, question the official narrative more closely, if your child contracted autism on the very day they got a shot...
Your child had a slight fever, but some had not symptoms at all, and that is not enough to show that each individual reacts differently to the shot! If there are differing reactions, why can't we concede that some people may be more susceptible than others? We are not allergic the same, so what is the problem?
The nurses, practitioners of many kinds, and doctors that I know, some in my family and some who I see professionally, overwhelmingly agree that vaccinations are a powerful force, and tool, for good.
Now this may be entirely true, or wrong, but shouldn't we consider that the primary reason for this strong supportive stance might be that they have, for their entire career, believed that vaccinations are a power for good, and that even the mere suggestion that it is not is an affront not only to their intellect, but morally as well?
Who, with so much education, making daily life and death decisions, would readily admit the remote possibility that they have been duped. Surely, a doctor three hundred years ago would look at how medicine is being practiced today as magic. And surely, without a doubt, with computer compilations that create new data, with the ability to save it all, and making it easily accessible to all those working on similar projects.
That, for the sake of reason, we are doubling our store of knowledge in most all of the sciences, every 2.2 years? Could there be, Lord forbid, something that might curb this expansion of knowledge? Perhaps a reluctance to relinquish power, control, and a black bottom line?
If everyone would just back up a moment, and look into each others eyes, they would see the same thing: Goodness, Love, accountability, responsibility, obligation, duty, honor, and all of it motivated by fear.
Points to consider...
1.) There is the trust issue. Both big corporations and government, all modern governments, work together for a common cause. Some corporations in Russia feel competitive with some Western corporations, and central banks too.
Do you think that Western inventions are protected by law beyond the borders of China, Russia, or India? International law? Ever wonder why our current Progressive government is so opposed to being under the jurisdiction of a system of international law? No, it has nothing to do with your right to bear arms, but of the profit margin in arms and drug trafficking.
If you really want truth, do a bit of homework using this question: “What does Afghanistan Poppy, Medicinal Marijuana, Benghazi, Iran, Saudi and Israel, Cuba and North Korea, have in common?” Want a hint? Its Profit. Corporate profit.
2.) If you vaccinate your children, and it works, then they surely must be safe from those who are not vaccinated. Unless, of course, the vaccination did not work. So what moral justification does one woman have over the other, if both ideals are flawed? Both are love and caring, responsible parents, who want to do what is right. If there are no guarantees, why then is the argument so cut and dry?
3.) Read the Public Health Service Act (PHSA). And how it deals with something they term “Quarantine.” Any resistance against the proclamation martial law, is futile, with unconstitutional draconian enforcement backed by the military. Yes, we trust them. We trust everything that is said on the black box too. They have never lied to us!
Now, you might be surprised to know that I have not yet made a decision on this issue here, but after seeing the video above, you just might see the light....
I did know a woman in Crowley. LA, who has been raising a child who was normal the same day it was inoculated, over thirty years ago. “While we were driving home, I saw the change in her. I saw her alert, with sparkling eyes that recognized me and reacted to me, and I watched them turn dull and without light before we got home.
She didn't die that day, only her future did, because she is still four years old. There is no way anyone can tell me that shot had nothing to do with it. It can't be proved, so they told me, but I live with it every day, and I know damned well the shot did it.” This year she will be 38. She still plays with the same teddy bear, has never learned to read, and is barley potty trained.
She can not be trusted alone, and has to be monitored from the time she wakes up till she is bathed and put to sleep. She is diagnosed with having autism, and no one can explain how or why. Don't we have an obligation to ask these questions? Any loving and responsible parent would.
“I do not agree with a word that you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” - Voltaire
