 |
| Get Your Daily Dose of Humor and Reality from A.F. (Tony) Branco |
_____________________________
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
Showing posts with label allahu akbar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label allahu akbar. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
Don't mess with Garland
From the art studios of A.F. (Tony) Branco at Comically Incorrect.com
ISIS zeroes in on five U.S. targets
From a news association and the files of Colonel Allen B. West
ISIS released a new online threat today on JustPasteIt. The terrorist group says they will murder Pamela Geller and kill anyone who shields her.
The terrorists also say they have 71 fighters in 15 different states and they 23 have signed up already for missions like the failed Sunday attack in Garland, Texas.
Via Sooper Mexican: Bismillah Ar Rahman Ar Raheem
“The New Era”
 |
| In God We Trust from Colonel Allen B. West |
ISIS released a new online threat today on JustPasteIt. The terrorist group says they will murder Pamela Geller and kill anyone who shields her.
The terrorists also say they have 71 fighters in 15 different states and they 23 have signed up already for missions like the failed Sunday attack in Garland, Texas.
Via Sooper Mexican: Bismillah Ar Rahman Ar Raheem
“The New Era”
To our brothers and sisters fighting for the Sake of Allah, we make dua for you and ask Allah to guide your bullets, terrify your enemies, and establish you in the Land. As our noble brother in the Phillipines said in his bayah, “This is the Golden Era, everyone who believes… is running for Shaheed”.
The attack by the Islamic State in America is only the beginning of our efforts to establish a wiliyah in the heart of our enemy. Our aim was the khanzeer Pamela Geller and to show her that we don’t care what land she hides in or what sky shields her; we will send all our Lions to achieve her slaughter.
This will heal the hearts of our brothers and disperse the ones behind her. To those who protect her: this will be your only warning of housing this woman and her circus show. Everyone who houses her events, gives her a platform to spill her filth are legitimate targets.
We have been watching closely who was present at this event and the shooter of our brothers. We knew that the target was protected. Our intention was to show how easy we give our lives for the Sake of Allah.
We have 71 trained soldiers in 15 different states ready at our word to attack any target we desire. Out of the 71 trained soldiers 23 have signed up for missions like Sunday, We are increasing in number bithnillah. Of the 15 states, 5 we will name… Virginia, Maryland, Illinois, California, and Michigan.
The disbelievers who shot our brothers think that you killed someone untrained, nay, they gave you their bodies in plain view because we were watching.This threat was "Tweeted" by Abu Al Ameriki.
The next six months will be interesting, To our Amir Al Mu’mineen make dua for us and continue your reign, May Allah enoble your face.
May Allah send His peace and blessings upon our Prophet Muhummad and all those who follow until the last Day.
Abu Ibrahim Al Ameriki
_____________________________
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
Sunday, March 1, 2015
ISIS has plenty of shovel ready jobs
From the art studios of A.F. (Tony) Branco and featured at Comically Incorrect.com
Check out some of the websites listed below that publish the A.F. (Tony) Branco Political Cartoon features.
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
 |
| Get Your Daily Dose of Humor from A.F. (Tony) Branco at Comically Incorrect.com |
Check out some of the websites listed below that publish the A.F. (Tony) Branco Political Cartoon features.
______________________________________________
Jihadi John: Another wealthy terrorist
From the files of Jeff Crouere at WLAE-TV 32 in New Orleans
In a recent interview, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that to fight terrorism, “we need to go after the root causes that lead people to join these groups, whether it’s a lack of opportunity for jobs….”
In other words, we can fight terrorism with a jobs program, sort of a stimulus program for the jihadists. If we only have enough shovel ready jobs for the jihadists, there will be no terrorism. How amazing naïve and how terrifyingly stupid, but this is the mentality that is prevalent throughout the Obama administration.
The history of Islamic terrorism is replete with examples of very rich Muslims, such as Osama Bin Laden, who join the jihad and kill for one basic reason and it is not the lack of a job. They kill the “infidels” because of their commitment to their Islamic faith, their interpretation of Islamic doctrine and their desire to serve Allah. It is why so many Islamic terrorists shout “Allahu Akbar” when they kill innocent people.
Harf either does not understand the threat we face or is purposely ignoring the threat, but, either way, it is troubling. Her “jobs” theory took another hit this week with the revelation of the identity of “Jihadi John,” the masked man seen in Islamic State videos beheading innocent hostages. According to multiple media and governmental sources, the masked man is Mohammed Emwazi, a 26 year old Kuwaiti, who moved to London with his family at an early age.
In London, he attended fine schools, was raised in an upper middle class neighborhood and received a degree in computer programming from the University of Westminster in 2009. In fact, he found employment as a computer programmer, but that job did not stop him from becoming radicalized.
According to Shiraz Maher of the King’s College radicalization center, Emwazi may well have traveled to Syria in 2012, later joining the Islamic State. In Maher’s view, Emwazi’s route to terrorism was not caused by the lack of economic opportunities. He said Emwazi’s case is similar to other jihadists, who are “by and large upwardly mobile people, well educated.”
The disclosures about Emwazi and the vast majority of Islamic terrorists should debunk the theory held by Harf and others in the Obama administration “that these guys are all impoverished, that they're coming from deprived backgrounds.”
Emwazi joined the Islamic State to commit terrorist acts and kill “infidels.” He was not looking for a job; he was looking for a religious crusade. He was motivated by religious fervor, not financial considerations.
Back in 2010, the British government recognized that Emwazi was becoming radicalized and prevented him from traveling to Tanzania. Reports indicate that the government was concerned that Emwazi was going to join the Islamic terror group Al-Shabaab.
Incredibly, some pro-Muslim activists criticized how the British government dealt with “Jihadi John” and blame his terrorist activity on supposed “mistreatment.” In reality, he was only targeted for surveillance due to his radical associations. If the government could have stopped him from traveling to Syria in 2012, possibly he would have been unable to join the Islamic State.
At the current time, “Jihadi John” is not using his computer programming degree; he is engaged in 7th century barbarism, beheading innocent hostages who have the misfortune of being captured by the Islamic State.
Unfortunately, at a time of great crisis, the country is being led by an administration that does not want to recognize this reality and refuses to admit the threat emanating from Islamic terrorism or even call it by its name. They prefer the title of “extremism,” a meaningless term for an administration engaged in a meaningless response to Islamic terrorism.
Jeff Crouere is a native of New Orleans, LA and he is the host of a Louisiana based program, “Ringside Politics,” which airs at 7:30 p.m. Friday and 10:00 p.m. Sunday on WLAE-TV 32, a PBS station, and 7 till 11 a.m. weekdays on WGSO 990 AM in New Orleans and the Northshore.
For more information, visit Jeff;s web site at www.ringsidepolitics.com or email him at jeff@ringsidepolitics.com.
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
 |
| Click Here to Visit the Jeff Crouere Website |
In a recent interview, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that to fight terrorism, “we need to go after the root causes that lead people to join these groups, whether it’s a lack of opportunity for jobs….”
In other words, we can fight terrorism with a jobs program, sort of a stimulus program for the jihadists. If we only have enough shovel ready jobs for the jihadists, there will be no terrorism. How amazing naïve and how terrifyingly stupid, but this is the mentality that is prevalent throughout the Obama administration.
The history of Islamic terrorism is replete with examples of very rich Muslims, such as Osama Bin Laden, who join the jihad and kill for one basic reason and it is not the lack of a job. They kill the “infidels” because of their commitment to their Islamic faith, their interpretation of Islamic doctrine and their desire to serve Allah. It is why so many Islamic terrorists shout “Allahu Akbar” when they kill innocent people.
Harf either does not understand the threat we face or is purposely ignoring the threat, but, either way, it is troubling. Her “jobs” theory took another hit this week with the revelation of the identity of “Jihadi John,” the masked man seen in Islamic State videos beheading innocent hostages. According to multiple media and governmental sources, the masked man is Mohammed Emwazi, a 26 year old Kuwaiti, who moved to London with his family at an early age.
In London, he attended fine schools, was raised in an upper middle class neighborhood and received a degree in computer programming from the University of Westminster in 2009. In fact, he found employment as a computer programmer, but that job did not stop him from becoming radicalized.
According to Shiraz Maher of the King’s College radicalization center, Emwazi may well have traveled to Syria in 2012, later joining the Islamic State. In Maher’s view, Emwazi’s route to terrorism was not caused by the lack of economic opportunities. He said Emwazi’s case is similar to other jihadists, who are “by and large upwardly mobile people, well educated.”
The disclosures about Emwazi and the vast majority of Islamic terrorists should debunk the theory held by Harf and others in the Obama administration “that these guys are all impoverished, that they're coming from deprived backgrounds.”
Emwazi joined the Islamic State to commit terrorist acts and kill “infidels.” He was not looking for a job; he was looking for a religious crusade. He was motivated by religious fervor, not financial considerations.
Back in 2010, the British government recognized that Emwazi was becoming radicalized and prevented him from traveling to Tanzania. Reports indicate that the government was concerned that Emwazi was going to join the Islamic terror group Al-Shabaab.
Incredibly, some pro-Muslim activists criticized how the British government dealt with “Jihadi John” and blame his terrorist activity on supposed “mistreatment.” In reality, he was only targeted for surveillance due to his radical associations. If the government could have stopped him from traveling to Syria in 2012, possibly he would have been unable to join the Islamic State.
At the current time, “Jihadi John” is not using his computer programming degree; he is engaged in 7th century barbarism, beheading innocent hostages who have the misfortune of being captured by the Islamic State.
Unfortunately, at a time of great crisis, the country is being led by an administration that does not want to recognize this reality and refuses to admit the threat emanating from Islamic terrorism or even call it by its name. They prefer the title of “extremism,” a meaningless term for an administration engaged in a meaningless response to Islamic terrorism.
_________________________________________________
Jeff Crouere is a native of New Orleans, LA and he is the host of a Louisiana based program, “Ringside Politics,” which airs at 7:30 p.m. Friday and 10:00 p.m. Sunday on WLAE-TV 32, a PBS station, and 7 till 11 a.m. weekdays on WGSO 990 AM in New Orleans and the Northshore.
For more information, visit Jeff;s web site at www.ringsidepolitics.com or email him at jeff@ringsidepolitics.com.
______________________________________________
Friday, January 16, 2015
The Truth Behind Obama's Defense of Islam
WHAT’S THE STORY? The Truth Behind Obama’s Defense of Islam by Jeannie DeAngelis at Clash Daily
Regardless of what Muslim adherents say, every time a terrorist beheads, shoots, or blows up civilized human beings, an unsolicited handful of world leaders feel it’s their duty to step forward to clarify that those doing the terrorizing aren’t really Muslims.
That’s why someone should really find out who is convincing non-Muslim terrorists to pretend to be Muslim, because if ever there was cause for confusion, the “terrorists aren’t Muslim” issue is it.
From France’s President François Hollande to America’s very own President Barack Obama, apologists simply refuse to agree that those who openly admit dedication to the prophet Mohammed are fervent followers of the Islamic faith.
Although with great regularity Islamic extremists begin and end their bloodbaths by shouting “Allahu Akbar” and go enthusiastically to their deaths proud to be “avenging the prophet” Mohammed, for some strange reason President Obama feels it is his obligation to repudiate the testimony of martyrs.
Not only that, but a contradiction arises, because as the president has already proven with his “bitter clinger” remark, if a shooter were to shout “Praise Jesus” instead of “Allahu Akbar”, it’s highly unlikely similar PR would be offered on behalf of Christians.
Let’s face it – in the ongoing effort to place Christians in the crosshairs of progressive criticism, those on the left cannot afford to have Muslims out-evil the “right wing extremists” and Bible-thumpers. That’s why, regardless of how many body bags jihadists fill, Obama will always be at the ready to remediate the reputation of Islam in the eyes of those who see it for what it is.
So what if Muslims blow away political cartoonists for exercising the right to free expression. As evidenced by the Ferguson, Missouri street riots and the tacitly government-approved animosity directed toward police officers, here in Obama’s America, lack of tolerance exhibited by one group no longer justifies refusal to tolerate the intolerable in the other.
Yet the question here is why does Barack Obama refuse to take Muslim jihadists at their word?
Could it be because terrorism places Mohammed in a bad light, and according to a politically pragmatic president attempting to cultivate cultural and religious diversity, “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam?”
Also, according to Barack Obama, “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.” Therefore, by his insistence on portraying Islam in a light contrary to reality, what the president is actually doing is ensuring tolerance be extended to the intolerant.
As the body count continues to rise, Barack Obama continues to assert that “Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace.”
Huh?
Who cares if three individuals declaring vengeance for Allah wreak bloody havoc on an iconic European city? If Barack Obama decides that Islamic “rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings,” then even if what he says is contradicted by what is actually happening, one way or another his complicated rhetoric will twist the truth and blatant lies will eventually be accepted.
Let’s not forget, this is Barack Obama, the man who has redefined everything from Hope and Change to what constitutes police “acting stupidly.” Therefore, why shouldn’t he also redefine Islam, even if doing so controverts the profession of faith by those willing to be die for their beliefs?
What’s odd is that this defense of Islam is coming from a man who claims to be a Christian. Then again, it’s probably easy for Obama to disavow the claims of terrorists who call themselves Muslims because, despite admitting belief in Jesus, the president lives a life alien to the creed Christ lays out for His followers.
By his own example, Barack Obama has shed much-needed light on individuals who identify with a religious dogma and then act in a way contrary to their stated beliefs. Whether the president realizes it or not, the benchmarks he’s put forth in defense of Islam are standards that can also be applied to his own dubious relationship with God of the New Testament.
In truth, when it comes to liberal social edicts that support abortion on demand, gay marriage and free contraceptives, the president of the United States is nothing more than another radical extremist who, instead of an AK-47 or a machete, uses a phone and a pen. Moreover, everything that is “honorable, and right, and pure, and lovely” has already been dumbed down and ascribed a new meaning, so why not Islam?
Even still, notwithstanding the president’s effort to whitewash the “religion of peace,” in addition to Obama’s dogged assertion that disciples of Mohammed blowing away shoppers in a deli merely for being Jewish has nothing to do with the faith they proclaim, there may be other, more useful benefits that can result from the president reinventing reality.
Maybe what Obama is doing has little to do with Islam. The same way basic concepts of freedom and fairness have been redefined, mischaracterizing Islam may be just another example of the world’s most dedicated cultural Marxist assigning different meanings to conventional perceptions in order to skew the truth and control the opinion of the masses.
After all, the president’s socialist vision hinges on framing a make-believe world. That’s why the left’s most valuable tool is still propaganda. So, although initially the president’s “terrorists aren’t Muslim” posturing seemed confusing, on second thought it may not be confusing at all.
Barack Obama’s attempt to redefine a 1,400-year-old religion to suit his political agenda may have nothing to do with protecting Islam. Instead, shielding Muslims from condemnation may be part of an ongoing effort to remake, redefine, and impact reality so dramatically that what will finally take hold is unquestioning compliance.
Visit the personal site of Jeannie DeAngelis at Jeannie-Ology.com
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
 |
| From the Files of Jeannie DeAngelis at Clash Daily |
That’s why someone should really find out who is convincing non-Muslim terrorists to pretend to be Muslim, because if ever there was cause for confusion, the “terrorists aren’t Muslim” issue is it.
From France’s President François Hollande to America’s very own President Barack Obama, apologists simply refuse to agree that those who openly admit dedication to the prophet Mohammed are fervent followers of the Islamic faith.
Although with great regularity Islamic extremists begin and end their bloodbaths by shouting “Allahu Akbar” and go enthusiastically to their deaths proud to be “avenging the prophet” Mohammed, for some strange reason President Obama feels it is his obligation to repudiate the testimony of martyrs.
Not only that, but a contradiction arises, because as the president has already proven with his “bitter clinger” remark, if a shooter were to shout “Praise Jesus” instead of “Allahu Akbar”, it’s highly unlikely similar PR would be offered on behalf of Christians.
Let’s face it – in the ongoing effort to place Christians in the crosshairs of progressive criticism, those on the left cannot afford to have Muslims out-evil the “right wing extremists” and Bible-thumpers. That’s why, regardless of how many body bags jihadists fill, Obama will always be at the ready to remediate the reputation of Islam in the eyes of those who see it for what it is.
So what if Muslims blow away political cartoonists for exercising the right to free expression. As evidenced by the Ferguson, Missouri street riots and the tacitly government-approved animosity directed toward police officers, here in Obama’s America, lack of tolerance exhibited by one group no longer justifies refusal to tolerate the intolerable in the other.
Yet the question here is why does Barack Obama refuse to take Muslim jihadists at their word?
Could it be because terrorism places Mohammed in a bad light, and according to a politically pragmatic president attempting to cultivate cultural and religious diversity, “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam?”
Also, according to Barack Obama, “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.” Therefore, by his insistence on portraying Islam in a light contrary to reality, what the president is actually doing is ensuring tolerance be extended to the intolerant.
As the body count continues to rise, Barack Obama continues to assert that “Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace.”
Huh?
Who cares if three individuals declaring vengeance for Allah wreak bloody havoc on an iconic European city? If Barack Obama decides that Islamic “rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings,” then even if what he says is contradicted by what is actually happening, one way or another his complicated rhetoric will twist the truth and blatant lies will eventually be accepted.
Let’s not forget, this is Barack Obama, the man who has redefined everything from Hope and Change to what constitutes police “acting stupidly.” Therefore, why shouldn’t he also redefine Islam, even if doing so controverts the profession of faith by those willing to be die for their beliefs?
What’s odd is that this defense of Islam is coming from a man who claims to be a Christian. Then again, it’s probably easy for Obama to disavow the claims of terrorists who call themselves Muslims because, despite admitting belief in Jesus, the president lives a life alien to the creed Christ lays out for His followers.
By his own example, Barack Obama has shed much-needed light on individuals who identify with a religious dogma and then act in a way contrary to their stated beliefs. Whether the president realizes it or not, the benchmarks he’s put forth in defense of Islam are standards that can also be applied to his own dubious relationship with God of the New Testament.
In truth, when it comes to liberal social edicts that support abortion on demand, gay marriage and free contraceptives, the president of the United States is nothing more than another radical extremist who, instead of an AK-47 or a machete, uses a phone and a pen. Moreover, everything that is “honorable, and right, and pure, and lovely” has already been dumbed down and ascribed a new meaning, so why not Islam?
Even still, notwithstanding the president’s effort to whitewash the “religion of peace,” in addition to Obama’s dogged assertion that disciples of Mohammed blowing away shoppers in a deli merely for being Jewish has nothing to do with the faith they proclaim, there may be other, more useful benefits that can result from the president reinventing reality.
Maybe what Obama is doing has little to do with Islam. The same way basic concepts of freedom and fairness have been redefined, mischaracterizing Islam may be just another example of the world’s most dedicated cultural Marxist assigning different meanings to conventional perceptions in order to skew the truth and control the opinion of the masses.
After all, the president’s socialist vision hinges on framing a make-believe world. That’s why the left’s most valuable tool is still propaganda. So, although initially the president’s “terrorists aren’t Muslim” posturing seemed confusing, on second thought it may not be confusing at all.
Barack Obama’s attempt to redefine a 1,400-year-old religion to suit his political agenda may have nothing to do with protecting Islam. Instead, shielding Muslims from condemnation may be part of an ongoing effort to remake, redefine, and impact reality so dramatically that what will finally take hold is unquestioning compliance.
Visit the personal site of Jeannie DeAngelis at Jeannie-Ology.com
______________________________________________
Sunday, January 4, 2015
ISIS Islamic Penal Code: Comply or Die
ISIS Islamic penal code: Comply or Die from Audrey Russo at Clash Daily.com
If you ever thought that devout Muslims, such as ISIS, weren’t concerned with law and order…you’d be mistaken. According to MEMRI, ISIS has a “new” penal code they WILL enforce ardently…upon ALL who live under its rule.
That would be Muslim or infidel alike. It begins with Quranic verses that implore Muslims to obey the Sharia (Islamic Law), and considering all who refuse to comply…equal to an unbeliever.
Here are its crimes and their respective punishments:
Banditry ~ thievery:
Because as surreptitiously as they have crept into our language (“Islamophobia”) and used our laws meant to protect our freedoms, AGAINST our freedoms (Lawfare), they will surely influence our own Legal system, to our detriment and bondage.
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
 |
| Read the Russo Report at Clash Daily |
That would be Muslim or infidel alike. It begins with Quranic verses that implore Muslims to obey the Sharia (Islamic Law), and considering all who refuse to comply…equal to an unbeliever.
Here are its crimes and their respective punishments:
- Blasphemy against Allah ~ Death. (Quran 6:93; 33:57; 33:61)
- Blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad ~ Death even if the accuser repents, so no Mercy from Allah the merciful. (Quran 6:93; 33:57; 33:61)
- Blasphemy against Islam ~ Death (Quran 6:93; 33:57; 33:61)
- Adultery ~ Death by Stoning, if the adulterer was married, and 100 lashes and exile if he or she were unmarried - if she makes it through the 100 lashes. Notice that the adulterer is a “she”. (Bukhari 6:60:79; 83:37)
- Sodomy - homosexuality ~ Death for the person committing the act, as well as for the one receiving it. (Quran 7:80-84)
- Theft ~ Cutting off the hand (Quran 5:38)
- Drinking alcohol ~ 80 lashes forbidden (Quran 2:219; 4:43; 5:90) (Bukhari, Punishments, vol. 8, 6776)
- Slandering unless you happen to be doing it for the sake of Allah and Islam, which is Taqiyya, then it’s ok ~ 80 lashes
- Spying for the unbelievers - we see this carried out in Gaza, as well: Death Apostasy - Leaving Islam ~ Death
Banditry ~ thievery:
- Murder and stealing ~ Death and crucifixion
- Murder only ~ Death
- Stealing as part of banditry ~ Cutting off the right hand and the left leg
- Terrorizing people ~ Exile
Because as surreptitiously as they have crept into our language (“Islamophobia”) and used our laws meant to protect our freedoms, AGAINST our freedoms (Lawfare), they will surely influence our own Legal system, to our detriment and bondage.
______________________________________________
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Moderate Muslims: In the U.S. Army?
TICKING TIME BOMB: ‘Moderate’ Muslims In The US Military from the files of Audrey Russo at Clash Daily.com
We live in a time when not every family has someone serving OR knows someone serving in our Armed Forces. So, it’s reasonable that there are many who do not know what the purpose is of the US Military.
Here is the current oath of enlistment:
What most in the West may not realize is that Islam is NOT a religion like Christianity and Judaism. Islam is a complete totalitarian system cloaked (or burqaed) in religion…which provides for its easy prayer rug ride into any Western culture…
In Islam, the state is intended to be inseparable from religious rule. Islamic law, or Sharia, is complete and not designed to coexist with or be subordinate to any other legal system. Qur’an (18:26) ~ “[Allah] maketh none to share in his government.”
So, what do we make of so-called moderate Muslims? Those who purport the peaceful, pre-Medina verses of the Quran (the verses written before Jews and Christians rejected Muhammed as a prophet) comprise between 0.5% – 1.0% of our US Military. Of this tiny sector, there is a disproportionate number of “moderates” who suddenly became devout, namely:
Not an encouraging snapshot of those who were formerly considered “moderate” Muslim, now devout (radical). And that’s not to mention those Muslim civilians working for the Defense Dept. The recent example is that of Mostafa Ahmed Awwad, 35, of Yorktown, Va.
He was arrested for giving an FBI undercover agent, posing as an Egyptian intelligence officer, secret documents about the new Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier while discussing how to sink the vessel with a missile. The Ford is being built in Virginia for delivery to the Navy in 2016.
A devout Muslim’s allegiance to Islam is utmost and imperative. This should be unequivocal proof that even “moderate” Muslims are unfit for US Military duty.
Unfit, if the mission is still to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. They should be considered a ticking time-bomb that needs to be deactivated.
If our Military is not safe…neither will our freedom be.
Become a Truth Serum Partner Now
 |
| Read the Russo Files at Clash Daily.com |
We live in a time when not every family has someone serving OR knows someone serving in our Armed Forces. So, it’s reasonable that there are many who do not know what the purpose is of the US Military.
Here is the current oath of enlistment:
I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.Boiling it down, our Military takes an oath to protect and defend the US Constitution against ALL enemies foreign and domestic…and this is where their allegiance rests. Hence lies the rub with Islam,
What most in the West may not realize is that Islam is NOT a religion like Christianity and Judaism. Islam is a complete totalitarian system cloaked (or burqaed) in religion…which provides for its easy prayer rug ride into any Western culture…
In Islam, the state is intended to be inseparable from religious rule. Islamic law, or Sharia, is complete and not designed to coexist with or be subordinate to any other legal system. Qur’an (18:26) ~ “[Allah] maketh none to share in his government.”
So, what do we make of so-called moderate Muslims? Those who purport the peaceful, pre-Medina verses of the Quran (the verses written before Jews and Christians rejected Muhammed as a prophet) comprise between 0.5% – 1.0% of our US Military. Of this tiny sector, there is a disproportionate number of “moderates” who suddenly became devout, namely:
- Hasan Akbar (aka Mark Fidel Kools) who turned on his fellow soldiers, killing two and wounding 15. (2003)
- Hasan Nidal, who murdered 14 (including an unborn baby) and wounding 30 at a Fort Hood (yelling “Allahu Akbar”). (2009)
- Naser Jason Abdo, near Fort Hood, arrested with an unregistered firearm and allegedly planning to attack a restaurant frequented by soldiers from the base. (2011)
Not an encouraging snapshot of those who were formerly considered “moderate” Muslim, now devout (radical). And that’s not to mention those Muslim civilians working for the Defense Dept. The recent example is that of Mostafa Ahmed Awwad, 35, of Yorktown, Va.
He was arrested for giving an FBI undercover agent, posing as an Egyptian intelligence officer, secret documents about the new Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier while discussing how to sink the vessel with a missile. The Ford is being built in Virginia for delivery to the Navy in 2016.
A devout Muslim’s allegiance to Islam is utmost and imperative. This should be unequivocal proof that even “moderate” Muslims are unfit for US Military duty.
Unfit, if the mission is still to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. They should be considered a ticking time-bomb that needs to be deactivated.
If our Military is not safe…neither will our freedom be.
______________________________________________